It struck me recently that while every traditional publisher is trying to lose the P word, calling themselves information providers, media companies, or anything with the D word (digital), everyone else has become, and loves calling themselves, a publisher. Irony of ironies.

AudienceScience, Google’s sales force, you name it: they all talk about “publishers,” and they mean anyone with a website. And they use the word with pride and digital hip-ness, just as folks who deliver books, magazines, newspapers or journals scurry from the word like mice in a kitchen. 

The reality is that everyone today is a publisher, and enterprises that have invested billions in their own websites are too. In 2001, I gave a presentation where I said that the global 2000 would become the dot-coms of the future. I still have the slide that referenced companies like Johnson & Johnson with BabyCenter, Microsoft with its developer sites, and a litany of famous brands that had websites to market themselves or provide content, commerce, community, or all of the above. Suddenly it’s 2010 and we’re here in a big way. Enterprises have become “the accidental publisher.”

I hear from leaders who work closely with digital marketers in said enterprises, that these marketers are struggling with content creation (custom publishing parallels here?), what to take offline vs. what their sites do online (print-to-digital in our world, bricks vs. clicks in theirs). They’re trying to engage audiences (audience development, anyone?) and measure performance. Outsell’s Chuck Richard has been saying provide marketing services and the opportunities abound; the parallel is amazing and it’s imperative the industry not run from its roots but rather embrace them and serve whole new worlds in whole new ways. Brandish the P word with pride!

Share & Save

A recent Insight we published for clients provides an analysis of study results released by the Nielsen Company last week. More fodder on consumers’ propensity to pay (or not) for paid media. Nielsen’s data echoes Forrester’s recent study and our own study of over 2,500 news consumers. The news isn’t good for anyone betting on consumers paying for content online. No surprise here: consumer willingness to spend online mirrors where they are willing to pay offline – movies, games, music, TV (cable). News and magazines come out in the middle, and stuff consumers are used to getting for free (social media, blogs) they show no propensity to pay for anytime soon. And why should they? They’ve been trained to receive content free or highly subsidized by advertising for decades, and the total amounts they spend aren’t great. What they spend is also tied to household budgets – what they have to spend – and that isn’t changing any time soon. So to assume there are scads of new dollars ready to be applied to paid content is simply naïve.

We aren’t surprised by the study results. We’re surprised that the media finds them surprising. We’ve been following the money flows of the information industry for 10+ years, and the bottom line is that the money that flows into consumer or business media is driven by their bottom lines. So rather than looking at business models as the next new thing, it’s time for publishers to pay more attention to serious product design, user engagement, and features that delight and differentiate – and build up a potentially lucrative loyal reader base in the process. Moving where the money comes from, while giving a true indication of what the product is worth (that’s one thing paid models are great for) isn’t the answer. It’s time for the industry to stop thinking it is.

Share & Save

Longtime colleague and industry veteran Colin Crawford’s viewpoints are favorites of mine. In this post he captures so well the realities of how mobile and personal devices will continue to force the issue of accountability and metrics for publishers and advertising scorekeepers. One thing is for certain: the iPad and related devices are going to be the ultimate mash-up of passive and active user behaviors – with outcomes not yet clear. Colin’s views are provocative and a must-read.

Share & Save

By now many of you will have seen the announcement that Gilbane Group has become part of Outsell, Inc.

A recent theme emerging in this blog has been the importance of the user experience. This coming decade the information providers most likely to succeed are those who can provide their users with wonderful experiences, the innovators who can ensure that their content is accessed and experienced in new and unique ways.

The Gilbane Group is the acknowledged authority on content technologies. Their coverage and analysis of the trends in web content management, enterprise search and enterprise social media is unrivaled.

So, I’m delighted that together the two teams will be in an even stronger position to support information providers and enterprises as they continue to accelerate the pace of change. The Gilbane Group will continue as a division of Outsell, under the leadership of President, Frank Gilbane.

I believe that this is a terrific development, both for our two firms and for the wider industry. Afterall, we too must continue to provide great experiences. I invite you to share your views.

Share & Save

Barnes and Noble entered the textbook rental market earlier this month and the competition to traditional publishers can’t come fast enough in the eyes of many consumers.  There’s nothing that gets the ire of a college student more than the feeling of being ripped off and then comes the rage against the machine that only teens seem to muster. In my earlier post, I referenced my own son’s experience. Sure enough this go-around  semester tuition to the local community college held steady at $340 but books  for the semester came in a whopping $643, almost double the $667 annual average cited in a recent San Francisco Chronicle article.

This post is less about a rant on textbook publishers and more about information companies creating wonderful experiences– something critical to success in 2010 and beyond and something I’m committed to profiling since it’s so critical to the theme of this blog. In the face of a daunting economy, prices rising faster than a thermometer in the Mojave will send beleaguered consumers fleeing to find solace in great little companies with great services.

Check out Chegg as an example.  You’ll love this site and company. The interface is easy – steps 1 2 3 easily spelled out. They promise to plant a tree (who could argue?) and they show a running total of how much they are saving people which everyone loves especially when they’re upset with traditional forces. Chegg is creating a great experience and it’s not just about the content or business model. It’s about the ethos and spirit of what they’re up to on top of the basics – save money and make it easy. It’s these kinds of companies who will be successful in our new day, new dawn, new decade. As we said in the Outlook, the future belongs to companies who create a great experience and who support basics – save money, make money, or mitigate risk.  Chegg’s got it down right.

Share & Save

While the news industry comes crashing down there are daily examples of new money to be made in the information industry, simply by reading (drum roll of irony here) the news! Two recent articles, one in the SF Chronicle, and the other in the Wall Street Journal, point to new business information opportunities for publishers and providers to take stock of. The US government isn’t going to do either of these well. Heck, the current administration is up to its eyeballs in alligators over health reform but ironically won’t create standards for and measure medical errors. Hmmm.  And there is no chance that standard ratings for international airlines are going to get any attention while Uncle Sam is trying to solve its own intelligence failures focused on passengers who fly on said airlines.

So this leaves good old ingenuity up to the likes of Hearst Business, Vendome Group, Ascend or McGraw-Hill Aviation Group to come up with some good reliable trusted information that it can serve-up and sell. The industry needs new money and the news continues to point to it.  Any takers?

Share & Save

The week and year started off with a bang with Gartner buying Burton and Dow Jones merging two major divisions indicative of two major trends we discussed in our Outlook 2010 – thinking platforms vs. products and more consolidation at the top.  Across and within companies things are being combined everywhere as the combination of technology and the economy accelerate our industry’s moves from product-centric to market-centric. Just yesterday I spoke to one CEO who took over 100 brands and migrated them into 9.

When looking at a user or a market and working backwards to what they need to make decisions, the containers and titles become a barrier. The smartphones, readers and tablets are only going to accelerate this, so look for more change ahead. My mother used to say the only thing that is constant is change. Take good enough, the realities of all our pricing and advertising and information spending research, the notion our recession is not going to be a “V” and “recovery” continues to be jobless and you’re going to see more acquisitions and more integrations.

The result – inside each industry segment and in most companies there are the 2 or 3 gorillas and the chimps – –the big sized firms and all the little ones OR the divisions that make all the money and ‘the other ones.’   The more things change the more they stay the same. Look for more of this same – in 2010.   And we’re off – happy New Year!

Share & Save

I’m back after a few weeks off and probably broke every blog rule in the book but sometimes you just have to stop writing and tend to the home front.  My focus: money and marketing in the information industry this year and I’m also going to sprinkle in more observations about industry companies that we think are doing things right—delivering phenomenal experiences in our era of a new day, new dawn and new decade. We see this as the path to success and growth in 2010 so expect to hear more here on our 30 to watch and other exciting firms who are going to stake a place in the race for next year’s selection.

Share & Save

Last week’s article in the San Francisco Chronicle about the evolution of
mobile technology augmenting how we see the world is a must read for any
publisher and information provider. Outsell has been saying we’re
entering the age of experience and this article captures the essence of
new user experiences and where they are headed. Whether reviews and
ratings, preparing for legal briefs, learning, or clinical workflow
information – the ability to see, do, feel, hear, plan, practice and
execute is changing our world of business information. This article
provides a peek into those realities with current consumer apps and it’s
amazing.

Share & Save

Two of our analysts caught wind of this note on LinkedIn this week and it’s a bit startling:

————————————————————————————————————
GARTNER SURVEY

As part of a consulting engagement to understand consumer preferences around mobile PCs (laptop, notebook, netbook); we have launched a web survey across several countries.

In addition, we are inviting Gartner Associates’, their families and their friends to participate in the survey.

————————————————————————————————————-

The survey can be found at: http://www.ciwweb.com/~mobilepc/logologn.htm

As a follower of research firms and as one ourselves it struck us as odd that a respected brand and leader in its space would offer up a survey to its alumni network. And for research for a paid consulting engagement? By doing this (planned or unplanned) they made the survey open to anyone on the open web, opening their response pool to virtually anyone. The approach not only introduces bias into the study because of the group chosen, it also mars how any client could potentially feel about how research is done on their behalf, especially with a firm whose tagline on their website reads “world class research and insights to meet your needs.”  In a world where anyone is an analyst or a consultant – this consultant now being armed with SurveyMonkey and an open website and his social network does his client and the Gartner brand a disservice. Given that Gartner is faced with a lawsuit about its research and client ethics practices, it’s especially poor timing.  And they still don’t appear to have a published ethics and integrity policy on their site or one easily findable, something we’ve advocated for years.
Says one member of the Outsell team – “this reminds me of an old market research story from one of my professors at Babson who was discussing sampling and questionnaire wording . Back when Ford was designing the Edsel they sent a bunch of researchers to ask simple questions, one simple framing one was to describe the kind of car you think your brother-in-law would like.” Turns out Edsel bombed and people didn’t think highly of their brother-in-laws.

Gartner is too good for this and it’s a research moment gone awry.  Let’s hope Gartner’s friends and family like the company sponsoring this research and have good views about mobile PCs.  I think I’ll ask the extended-Stratigos clan to answer our next news-user study too.

Share & Save